UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

HINDY HOCHHAUSER, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, 2019-CV-2468 (ARR)

Plaintiff Opinion & Order

— against — Not for electronic or print publication GROSSMAN & KARASZEWSKI, PLLC,

Defendant.

ROSS, United States District Judge: This Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated August 11, 2021, from the Honorable Cheryl L. Pollak, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-874 (CBA)(LB),

, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011), aff’d,

(2d Cir. 2012) (summary order). Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH)(LB),

, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd.,

(E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to

(b)(1). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter a default against defendant for failure to appear and plaintiff is authorized to file for default judgment. SO ORDERED. _______/s/________________ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge

Dated: September 1, 2021 Brooklyn, New York