UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x THE ANNUITY, WELFARE AND APPRENTICESHIP SKILL IMPROVEMENT & SAFETY FUNDS OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ORDER ADOPTING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 15, 15A, 15C & 15D, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AFL-CIO, by their Trustees James T. Callahan, 20-CV-3743 (PKC) (LB) Thomas A. Callahan, Michael Salgo, and William Tyson, CENTRAL PENSION FUND OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, by its Chief Executive Officer Michael A. Crabtree, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS NATIONAL TRAINING FUND, by its Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Vincent, and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 15, 15A, 15C & 15D, AFL-CIO, by its President & Business Manager Thomas A. Callahan,

Plaintiffs,

- against -

GLASSMAR STEEL ERECTORS, INC.,

Defendant. -------------------------------------------------------x PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge: On August 5, 2021, the Honorable Lois Bloom, Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Plaintiffs’ pending Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. 8) be granted and judgment entered against Defendant. (See generally R&R, Dkt. 15.) On August 6, 2021, Plaintiffs served a copy of the R&R via U.S. first class mail on Defendant. (Dkt. 16.) Pursuant to

(b)(1)(C) and Rule 72(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties had fourteen dates from the date of service of the R&R to file written objections. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds it to be thorough, well-reasoned, and not “clearly erroneous,” except for a few minor typographical or computational errors that are identified and corrected below. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see Prioleau v. Caserta, No. 10-CV-5670,

, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 2012) ("To accept the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge on a dispositive matter as to which no timely objection has been made, the district judge need only be satisfied that there is no clear error on the

face of the record."). Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety, with the following amendments. I. Amended ERISA Prejudgment Interest (End of Sub-Periods through June 2, 2020) To calculate prejudgment interest from the end of each of the sub-periods (i.e., Period 1, Period 2, Period 3, and Period 4) through June 2, 2020, the Court used the same interest rates and formula described in the R&R. (See R&R, Dkt. 15, at 9–10.) The Court generally agrees with Judge Bloom’s calculations, but makes a few minor corrections based on its review of the relevant audit record (Audit Report, Dkt. 12-10) and application of the formula. These minor corrections are indicated below in red. Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 No. of days between the end of Period through 6/2/2020 1068 884 703 338

Principal per Period Interest Due Total Interest Due Welfare $1,488.00 $261.24 $265.05 $432.58 $222.96 $1,181.83 $1,824.00 $3,743.25 $4,012.80 Pension $1,201.20 $316.33 $364.54 $554.78 $268.90 $1,504.55 $1,672.40 $3,200.50 $3,226.40 Annuity $2,304.00 $404.49 $405.86 $658.27 $323.04 $1,791.66 $2,793.00 $5,696.25 $5,814.00 Apprentice $144.00 $25.28 $33.13 $53.74 $25.34 $137.49 $228.00 $465.00 $456.00 MRA $240.00 $42.13 $41.41 $64.48 $30.40 $178.42 $285.00 $558.00 $547.20 Vacation $768.00 $134.83 $140.81 $228.38 $107.68 $611.70 $969.00 $1,976.25 $1,938.00 NTF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3.80 $3.80 $0.00 $0.00 $22.80 Total Principal $45,573.05 $5,409.45

II. Updated ERISA Prejudgment Interest (June 3, 2020 through Date the Court Enters Judgment) To calculate prejudgment interest from June 3, 2020 through the date the Court enters judgment, the Court also used the interest rates and formula described in the R&R. (See R&R, Dkt. 15, at 9–10.) Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 No. of days between 6/3/20 to the date the court enters judgment ( 9/8/2021) 463 463 463 463

Principal per Period Interest Due Total Interest Due Welfare $1,488.00 $113.25 $138.82 $284.90 $305.41 $842.38 $1,824.00 $3,743.25 $4,012.80 Pension $1,201.20 $137.13 $190.93 $365.38 $368.34 $1,061.78 $1,672.40 $3,200.50 $3,226.40 Annuity $2,304.00 $175.36 $212.57 $433.54 $442.50 $1,263.97 $2,793.00 $5,696.25 $5,814.00 Apprentice $144.00 $10.96 $17.35 $35.39 $34.70 $98.40 $228.00 $465.00 $456.00 MRA $240.00 $18.27 $21.69 $42.47 $41.65 $124.08 $285.00 $558.00 $547.20 Vacation $768.00 $58.45 $73.75 $150.41 $147.50 $430.11 $969.00 $1,976.25 $1,938.00 NTF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5.21 $5.21 $0.00 $0.00 $22.80 Total Principal $45,573.05 $3,825.93

III. Updated Total Judgment Amount As recommended in the R&R, the chart provided below includes updated calculations for additional prejudgment interest amounts through the date the Court enters judgment. (See R&R, Dkt. 15, at 18.) Plaintiff Local 15 Trust Funds, CPF, and NTF Plaintiff Local 15 $45,573.05 in unpaid ERISA contributions $3,756.81 in unpaid union dues and PAC contributions $9,235.38 in total interest on unpaid ERISA contributions from the end dates of the sub- $1,252.71 in additional prejudgment interest of periods through the date the court enters $0.93 per day between January 1, 2018 through judgment the date the court enters judgment

$5,489.64 in liquidated damages

$3,217.50 in attorney’s fees

$1,036.75 in audit fees

$515.00 in costs

TOTAL: $65,067.32 TOTAL: $5,009.52

The Court also makes the following amendments to the R&R. The Amended ERISA Prejudgment Interest chart set forth above shall replace the ERISA Prejudgment Interest chart in the R&R. (See R&R, Dkt. 15, at 10–11.) The Local 15 Trust Funds, CPF and NFT prejudgment interest on the principal sum of $45,573.05 calculated at interest rates set forth in the Trust Agreements through June 2, 2020 shall be $5,409.45 (not $5,409.38 or $5,405.56). (Id. at 11.) The Non-ERISA Damages chart shall reflect a “PAC” total of $67.05 (not $47.05). (Id. at 16; see Audit Report, Dkt. 12-10, at ECF1 1.) CONCLUSION The Court adopts the R&R with the amendments described herein. Plaintiffs’ [8] motion for default judgment is granted. A judgment shall be entered in Plaintiffs’ favor against Defendant Glassmar Steel Erectors, Inc. in the amount of $70,076.84, which includes prejudgment interest

1 Citations to “ECF” refer to the pagination generated by the Court’s CM/ECF docketing system and not the document’s internal pagination. through the date the Court enters judgment. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close the case. SO ORDERED.

/s/ Pamela K. Chen Pamela K. Chen United States District Judge Dated: September 3, 2021 Brooklyn, New York