Lutz v. Cuomo

District Court, N.D. New York

Lutz v. Cuomo

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

THOMAS A. LUTZ,

Plaintiff, 9:19-cv-0262 (BKS/CFH)

v.

ELIZABETH O’MEARA, et al.,

Defendants.

Appearances: Plaintiff, pro se: Thomas A. Lutz Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 For Defendants: Hon. Letitia James Jorge A. Rodriguez Assistant Attorney General New York State Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, United States District Judge: MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER Pro se Plaintiff Thomas A. Lutz, a former New York State inmate, commenced this action asserting claims under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

arising out of his incarceration. (Dkt. No. 1). On June 18, 2020, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with his discovery obligations. (Dkt. No. 31). Plaintiff did not respond to the motion. This matter was assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel who, on January 5, 2021, issued a Report-Recommendation recommending that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted and that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice. (Dkt. No. 34). Magistrate Judge Hummel advised the parties that under

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1), they had fourteen days within which to file written objections to the report, and that the failure to object to the report within fourteen days would preclude appellate review. (Dkt. No. 34, at 9). No objections have been filed. As no objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed, and the time for filing objections has expired, the Court reviews the Report- Recommendation for clear error. See Petersen v. Astrue,

2 F. Supp. 3d 223, 229

(N.D.N.Y. 2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error and found none, the Court adopts the Report- Recommendation in its entirety. For these reasons, it is ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 34) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (Dkt. No. 31) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order upon the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 3, 2021 Brrr ob cx Korres Syracuse, New York Brenda K. Sannes U.S. District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown