Chirse v. Southport Medical Dept.
Chirse v. Southport Medical Dept.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEVANTE CHIRSE, Plaintiff, 20-CV-11134 (CM) -against- TRANSFER ORDER SOUTHPORT MEDICAL DEPT, et al., Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff, currently incarcerated at Southport Correctional Facility (“Southport”), brings this pro se action under
42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants violated his rights at Southport, which is located in Pine City, Chemung County, New York. For the following reasons, this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. Under
28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), a civil action may be brought in (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action. Under § 1391(c), a “natural person” resides in the district where the person is domiciled, and an “entity with the capacity to sue and be sued” resides in any judicial district where it is subject to personal jurisdiction with respect to the civil action in question. See
28 U.S.C. § 1391(c)(1), (2). Plaintiff alleges that Defendants violated his rights at Southport. Because Plaintiff does not allege that any Defendant resides in this district or that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to his claim arose in this district, venue is not proper in this Court under § 1391(b)(1), (2). Plaintiff’s claims arose in Chemung County, which is in the Western District of New York. See
28 U.S.C. § 112(d). Accordingly, venue lies in the Western District of New York,
28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), and this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York,
28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is further directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. This order closes this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 5, 2021 New York, New York huh □□ Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown