Cardaci v. Van Eck Associates Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Cardaci v. Van Eck Associates Corporation

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CATHERINE CARDACTI, Plaintiff, No. 18-CV-9705 (RA) v. ORDER VAN ECK ASSOCIATES CORP., ET AL.,

Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same sixty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,

791 F.3d 354, 358

(2d Cir. 2015). The motion at Dkt. 60 is dismissed without prejudice to its renewal in the event that the parties move to reopen the case. The pre-trial conference scheduled for April 30, 2021, the trial scheduled for the week of May 3, 2021, and all current filing deadlines are hereby adjourned sine die. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 60. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 12, 2021 New York, New York fk / J“, Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown