Monegro v. Telebrands Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT nner reeneernreeeeX FRANKIE MONEGRO, on behalf of himself: DATE FILED: __!/19/2021 and all others similarly situated : Plaintiff, 20-CV-8555 (VSB) -against- ORDER TELEBRANDS CORP., Defendant.

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: On October 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant Telebrands Corp. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff obtained a summons on October 15, 2020. (Doc. 4.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an affidavit of service or taken any other action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that, no later than January 26, 2021, Plaintiff shall submit a letter of no more than three (3) pages, supported by legal authority, demonstrating good cause as to why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). “Good cause is generally found only in exceptional circumstances where the plaintiff's failure to serve process in a timely manner was the result of circumstances beyond its control.” E. Refractories Co. v. Forty Eight Insulations, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 503, 505 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted). “District courts consider the diligence of plaintiff's efforts to effect proper service and any prejudice suffered by the defendant as a consequence of the delay.” /d. (internal quotation marks omitted). “An attorney's inadvertence, neglect, mistake or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause.” Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler, 977 F Supp. 654, 658 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) (citing McGregor v. United States, 933 F.2d 156, 160 (2d Cir. 1991), aff'd, 173 F.3d 844 (2d Cir. 1999)). Plaintiff is warned that failure to submit a letter and to demonstrate good cause for failure to serve Defendant within ninety days after the complaint was filed will result in dismissal of this action.

SO ORDERED. j Dated: January 19, 2021 Aree Le a | PA New York, New York LAN ATOM a4 VERNON S. BRODERICK United States District Judge