Wang v. CGY & J Corp.
Wang v. CGY & J Corp.
Trial Court Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: Guo Hua Wang, individually and on behalf of DATE FILED:__ 2/10/2021 __ all others similarly situated, 1:19-cv-01772 (SDA Plaintiff, Y (SDA)
. ORDER -against- CGY & J Corp. d/b/a Kitaro et al., Defendants.
STEWART D. AARON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case contains one or more claims arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act. A settlement was reached by the parties at a settlement conference before me on February 2, 2021. The parties thereafter consented to have all proceedings held before me. (ECF No. 35.) In light of the requirements of Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.,
796 F.3d 199(2d Cir. 2015), the parties must file a joint letter or motion that addresses whether the settlement is fair and reasonable. Any such letter or motion shall be filed by Friday, February 26, 2021, and should address the claims and defenses, the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the bases for any such calculations, the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiffs’ case and the defendants’ defenses, any other factors that justify the discrepancy between the potential value of plaintiffs’ claims and the settlement amount, the litigation and negotiation process, as well as any other issues that might be pertinent to the question of whether the settlement is reasonable (for example, the collectability of any judgment if the case went to trial). The joint letter or motion should also explain the attorney fee arrangement, attach a copy
of the retainer agreement, and provide information as to actual attorney’s hours expended and the relevant experience of the attorney(s). Finally, a copy of the settlement agreement itself must accompany the joint letter or motion. SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York February 10, 2021
STEWARTD.AARON United States Magistrate Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown