Swartz v. 151 Maiden LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Swartz v. 151 Maiden LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

HELEN SWARTZ Plaintiff, No. 20-CV-9895 (RA) v. ORDER 151 MAIDEN LLC,

Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “‘so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,

791 F.3d 354, 358

(2d Cir. 2015). The conference scheduled for March 12, 2021 is adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 5, 2021 Yip y New York, New York ko JZ — Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown