District Court, S.D. New York, 2021

Monroe v. Rockland County Correctional Facility

Monroe v. Rockland County Correctional Facility
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided March 11, 2021
Monroe v. Rockland County Correctional Facility

Trial Court Opinion

| DOCUMENT MEMORANDUM ENDORSEMENT | ELECTRONICALLY FILED HDOCH □ Monroe v. HSA Nurse Administrator Jouliana, et al. DATE FILED: 3 [ul WLONTOS TPO A INUESS AGMIDISUALOT JOUNATA, CL di, qt ALE : □ The Court has received the attached submissions from plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis: a letter-motion, dated March 6, 2021, requesting appointment of pro bono counsel (Doc. #52), and a letter-motion, dated March 6, 2021, requesting a Magistrate Judge for this matter (Doc. #53). Plaintiff has also filed an opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss styled as a “Motion to Oppose” (Doc. # 54).

Regarding plaintiffs request for appointment of pro bono counsel, the Court has considered the type and complexity of this case, the merits of plaintiffs claims, and plaintiffs ability to present the case. At this time, the Court does not find any exceptional circumstances in plaintiffs case that would warrant the appointment of counsel. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989), Accordingly, plaintiff's request for appointment of pro bono counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Regarding plaintiffs request to “transfer[] these matters to a Magistrate Judge” (Doc. #53), the Court cannot do so unless ALL parties consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge for all purposes, including trial. Defendants are hereby ORDERED to consider whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. □ If both parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for the defendant must, by no later than March 25, 2021, file a letter with the Court, with an attached fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, the blank form for which is attached to this order (and also available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf). If plaintiff wishes to proceed in this fashion, he must sign and date the form where indicated and mail it to defense counsel. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this Order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The Clerk is directed to terminate plaintiff's letter-motions. (Docs. ##52, 53).

Because plaintiffs opposition to the pending motion to dismiss is not a new motion, the Clerk is directed to terminate plaintiff's opposition. (Doc. #54). To be clear, the Court will still consider plaintiff's opposition in ruling on defendants’ motion to dismiss, but it is not a separate motion.

Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket.

Dated: March 11, 2021 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED: Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge Gas Orie ° Cy, United States District Court © Southern District of New York One” UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGES: REFERRALS AND CONSENTS All cases in the Southern District of New York are assigned to two judges: a district judge and a magistrate judge. District judges are appointed for life terms by the President.

Magistrate judges are selected by a majority vote of the district judges in the particular district and serve terms of eight years.

Referrals to the Magistrate Judge: The district judge assigned to your case may refer the case to a magistrate judge for specific purposes. Commonly, the referral will be for the magistrate judge to conduct the proceedings that occur before trial, such as resolving discovery disputes or presiding over settlement conferences. A referral may also be made for the magistrate judge to issue to the district judge a report and recommendation on how to resolve a motion, such as a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment. The consent of the parties is not needed for the district judge to refer the case to the magistrate judge for these purposes. If the district judge has made such a referral, you can ask the district judge to review any magistrate judge’s decision by filing an objection with the district judge within fourteen days of that decision. The district judge will rule on any timely objections that you file. If you do not file an objection, you will give up your right to challenge the magistrate judge’s decision at a later time, including on appeal. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

Consent to Proceed Before the Magistrate Judge: If you would like your case to move more quickly, it is helpful to consent to proceed before the magistrate judge for all purposes, including any trial. If all parties consent, the magistrate judge will perform the identical function that the district judge would have performed. Any trial in your case would be either a jury or a nonjury trial, depending upon whether there is a right to a jury trial and a proper request for such a trial. The only difference is that the magistrate judge - and not the district judge — would preside over that trial. Cases that proceed for all purposes before a magistrate judge generally move more quickly than cases before a district judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the magistrate judge, the district judge plays no further role in the case. Any appeal is taken directly to the Court of Appeals. It is your choice whether or not to consent to proceed before the magistrate judge.

A copy of the appropriate consent form is attached. Additional forms are also available from the Pro Se Intake Unit and on the Court's website.

500 PEARL STREET | NEW York, NY 10007 QUARROPAS STREET | WHITE PLAINS, NY 10601 .

PRO SE INTAKE UNIT: 212-805-0175 Rev. 1/27/16 AO 85 (Rev. 02/17) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge nn UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Michael J. Monroe ) Plaintiff ) v. ) Civil Action No, 20-cv-06807 HSA Nurse Administrator Jouliana, et al. ) Defendant ) NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Notice of a magistrate judge’s availability. A United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to order the entry of'a final judgment. The judgment may then be appealed directly to the United States court of appeals like any other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent.

You may consent to have your case referred to a magistrate judge, or you may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding consent will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise be involved with your case.

Consent to a magistrate judge’s authority. The following parties consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings.

Printed names of parties and attorneys Signatures of parties or attorneys Dates Michael J. Monroe Defendants by Jeanne Nicole Gilbert, Esq.

Reference Order IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to a United States magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.

Date: District Judge's signature Printed name and title Note: Return this form to the clerk of court only if you are consenting to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States magistrate judge. Do not return this form to a judge.

| Case /.2U-CV-UDoUl-VBb VOCUMEML ol ried Vortuiet rage + Ula 4 [D ECEIVE □□□ ee at po ndel Slodes Dicktick Cau US nar 10 aoat fe □ | BLO nike if Q Neus Dt | SBT MM Wao| Us ALO _—_— {po at Plaid PO | yp □□□ adaiiss ~ _—___ __Makion | Stk NuwrSe A rnin HZ Vou AC p AL oF Ko AM leuitenant\. Micon, Cvchatv 7 Ci Co. _ — Delyndawrs _____— | ro inconk LL. Baccedky Us.d2 Il 306 Buc copass Seek 22, ~ Sudge. Ovccedta, nt —Methe usc Weooc cone yartiivg La Gega □□ by rena □ Peaigted Cursineol irture. elo Lm laating Shs Q Ste A DEOCL) 04 ps mane aw □□□□ le Wate, UCP 2, ava ST pow Cb Nace oe ik! □□□ LA : S| ermtteim.

KC) S Mo bo TT Neo Rey tos Nad Sw _| SS 0 120) YU □□□ Pd, oy Laer po □ UCase /.2U-CV-U00U/l/-VB VOCUTTeML OG Vor luiet Taye + uit | ee BGETVETS Unites SWokes Dietrick Claude UM LP | Southern Distteke® News Nock | beet L Wrelnool Nloame. □ : ip OO oot ew 07 WD : agginskee Netter of Motion Requoie A Slurse. Admiaishotoc “Saubionn, Magiatrete . : of Rockler), biewhenam Byon, “Sudsee Cnplein lien wo Sendak Hiolin ncacuees US. Distick Cech SDNY Qe rt PAS os eek □ — Shibe Claiwe New Yack abot Dear thie Bocce, . No evn ate ‘ tegecds AL rec: aL iE need bo Pormally Ci ark Goene oc act. EP Ig. me to Su uk daa ~ rina sbhase □□□□□□□□ Nogeite ee ade Bowe bee Pe . Ny ON ad kl

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.