Brigmohan v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Brigmohan v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK boc a FILED
SHAMNARINE BRIGMOHAN, DATE FILED: 3/26/2021 Plaintiff, 1:19-cv-06720-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL A. DUIE PYLE, INC., and ALEXANDER COYNE, Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter from the parties informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 55]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by April 23, 2021. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,
356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).
SO ORDERED. | i / lag Date: March 26, 2021 MARY/KAY New York, NY United States Disirict Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown