Onatolu v. Martin Luther King Statue
Onatolu v. Martin Luther King Statue
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ADEKUNLE A. ONATOLU, Plaintiff, 21-CV-2936 (CM) ~against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL MARTIN LUTHER KING STATUE, UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651Defendant. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: On July 9, 2015, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Onatolu v. U.S. Army, ECF 1:15-CV- 2829, 4 (S.D.N.Y. July 9, 2015). Plaintiff files this new case pro se and seeks IFP status, but he has not sought leave from the Court to file this action.' This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the July 9, 2015 order. The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: April 6, 2021 , New York, New York bie. l Wyk COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge
' Plaintiff attaches to his complaint a notice of appeal, a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, and a motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal. At the time Plaintiff filed his complaint, however, there was no order in this action from which to appeal, and the Court therefore does not address these documents.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown