Quezada v. Shar Products Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Quezada v. Shar Products Company

Trial Court Opinion

USDC-SDNY D MENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NCLRONIC ALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC#: DATE FILED: 4-6-21 JOSE QUEZADA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 21-CV-1093 (RA) v. ORDER SHAR PRODUCTS COMPANY, Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: According to the parties’ April 5, 2021 letter, Dkt. 12, the parties have reached a settlement in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson vy. United States,

791 F.3d 354, 358

(2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: = April 6, 2021 Vf , New York, New York Li. TO RONNIE ABRAMS United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown