Cifuentes v. Target Corporation
Cifuentes v. Target Corporation
Trial Court Opinion
USDC-SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: HAYDEE CIFUENTES, DATE FILED: 4-7-21 Plaintiff, 19-CV-6805 (RA) v. ORDER TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,
791 F.3d 354, 358(2d Cir. 2015). SO ORDERED. Dated: April 7, 2021 Vf , New York, New York ko ( _ RONNIE ABRAMS United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown