District Court, S.D. New York, 2021

Henao v. Parts Authority, LLC

Henao v. Parts Authority, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided April 6, 2021
Henao v. Parts Authority, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWOU YROTR K -------------------------------------------------------------X- : DAVIDSON HENAO, et al., : Plaintiff : : 19 Civ. 10720 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER PARTS AUTHORITY, LLC, et al., : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------X LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, on December 21, 2020, Defendants Arizona Logistics, Inc., BBB Logistics, Inc. and Larry Browne filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, insufficient service of process and lack of personal jurisdiction (Dkt. Nos. 132 & 133). Plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss on February 15, 2021 (Dkt. No. 145). The moving Defendants filed a reply on February 22, 2021 (Dkt. No. 148); WHEREAS, “[i]n deciding a pretrial motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction a district court has considerable procedural leeway. It may determine the motion on the basis of affidavits alone; or it may permit discovery in aid of the motion; or it may conduct an evidentiary hearing on the merits of the motion.” Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. Miller, 664 F.2d 899, 904 (2d Cir. 1981); WHEREAS, discovery is currently stayed as to Defendants BBB Logistics Inc., Arizona Logistics, Inc. and Larry Browne (Dkt. No. 131); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs state “evidence of how [Defendants] operate[] as a unified entity remains in the exclusive possession and control of Defendants. As such, Plaintiffs should, at a minimum, be allowed to complete discovery on this issue.” It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ request for limited jurisdictional discovery as to Defendants BBB Logistics, Inc., Arizona Logistics, Inc., and Larry Browne is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that by April 12, 2021, the Parties shall submit a proposed order and plan for completing limited jurisdictional discovery by May 14, 2021. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a supplement to their opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, not to exceed ten (10) pages, by May 21, 2021, and Defendants shall file a reply, not to exceed ten (10) pages, by May 28, 2021.

Dated: April 6, 2021 New York, New York UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.