Romero v. Curlmix Inc.
Romero v. Curlmix Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCH ONIC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 04/16/2021
JOSUE ROMERO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, No. 20-CV-7664 (RA) v. ORDER CURLMIX INC., Defendant.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: The Court has been advised that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,
791 F.3d 354, 358(2d Cir. 2015). SO ORDERED. Dated: April 16, 2021 “py New York, New York ( Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown