Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rio Tinto PLC
Trial Court Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE DOC —_____ COMMISSION, DATE FILED: __ 4/23/2021 Plaintiff, -against- 17 Civ. 7994 (AT) (DCF) RIO TINTO PLC, RIO TINTO LIMITED, ORDER THOMAS ALBANESE, and GUY ROBERT ELLIOTT, Defendants.
ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions at ECF Nos. 223, 226, 234, 237, 241.
Accordingly, the parties’ requests to redact portions of the deposition transcripts of Barnaby Fletcher and Steven Brice are GRANTED because they contain confidential information regarding non-party clients and informants and are narrowly tailored to protect those interests.
City of Almaty vy. Ablyazov, No. 15 Civ. 5345, 2021 WL 1177737, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2021) (stating that “it may be appropriate to redact some or all of the list of documents” that “reveal confidential communications with third-parties”); Cohen v. Gerson Lehrman Grp., Inc., No. 09 Civ. 4352, 2011 WL 4336679, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 15, 2011) (“The redactions are narrowly tailored to conceal the clients’ identity, and the privacy interests of [the] clients outweigh the presumption of access, as the clients’ identities have no bearing on this case.”).
The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 223, 226, 234, 241.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 23, 2021 □□ New York, New York ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.