Perez Molina v. Skyline Restoration Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Perez Molina v. Skyline Restoration Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX DONAL MAGALIEL PEREZ MOLINA et al., : individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, : Plaintiffs, : 21-CV-647 (JMF) -v- : ORDER SKYLINE RESTORATION INC. d/b/a SKYLINE : RESTORATION, et al., : Defendants. : wee KX JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: Pursuant to the Court’s Order dated April 9, 2021, ECF No. 28, and the extension granted in the Court’s Order dated April 23, 2021, ECF No. 33, no later than April 30, 2021. the parties were required to submit their settlement agreement to the Court along with a joint letter explaining the basis for the proposed settlement and why, if parties contemplate dismissal under Rule 41, it should be approved as fair and reasonable, with reference to the factors discussed in Wolinsky v. Scholastic, Inc.,

900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335-36

(S.D.N.Y. 2012). The letter was also to address, if applicable, any incentive payments to the plaintiffs and any attorney’s fee award to plaintiffs’ counsel (with documentation to support the latter, if appropriate). To date, the parties have not satisfied their obligations. As a courtesy, the parties’ deadline is hereby EXTENDED, nunc pro tunc, to May 6, 2021. Further extensions are unlikely to be granted. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 3, 2021 New York, New York ESSE M-FURMAN nited States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown