Sandoval v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. New York

Sandoval v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ' SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BR 7 |e | 2 □ i | CECILIA ISABEL CONDOR SANDOVAL, (dove oe

Plaintiff, ORDER -against- 20 Civ. 6500 (PED) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. wane eee PAUL E. DAVISON, U.S.MLJ.

By Order dated June 9, 2021, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Carr v. Saul,

141 S. Ct. 1352

(2021), I directed the parties “to meet and confer regarding whether this case should be remanded to the Commissioner for a new hearing before a constitutionally appointed Administrative Law Judge [“ALI”’] different from the ALJ who previously heard and adjudicated Plaintiffs claim for benefits.” Dkt. #29. On July 1, 2021, plaintiff filed a letter requesting remand pursuant to Carr (Dkt, #32); the Commissioner does not oppose this request (Dkt, #33). Accordingly, if is hereby ORDERED that this case be remanded for a new hearing before a different, properly appointed ALJ.

Dated: July 8, 2021 SO ORDERED? White Plains, New York oo . a ner NA SF PAUL E. DAVISON, U.S.MLJ. □□

Reference

Status
Unknown