Finnegan v. Chase Bank

District Court, S.D. New York

Finnegan v. Chase Bank

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SEAN MATTHEW FINNEGAN, Plaintiff, 21-CV-6103 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL CHASE BANK, Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated July 26, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(1), is dismissed under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court declines, under

28 U.S.C. § 1367

(c), to exercise supplemental jurisdiction of any state law claims that Plaintiff is asserting. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: August 27, 2021 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown