Graciano v. Matouk Textile Works, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Graciano v. Matouk Textile Works, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SANDY GRACIANO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, No, 21-CV-6727 (RA) v ORDER MATOUCK TEXTILE WORKS, INC., Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within forty- five (45) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty- day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,

791 F.3d 354, 358

(2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 13, 2021 New York, New York KA es Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown