UsDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT oe Pace erecta SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FIDED: 2/221

Gotay Rodriguez, Plaintiff, 20-cv-2819 (AJN) —y— ORDER Commissioner of Social Security, Defendants.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Before the Court is Judge Cave’s Report & Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings in this appeal of a denial of social security benefits, and remand the case for further administrative proceedings. When considering the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge, the Court may “accept, reject, or modify [them], in whole or in part.”

(b) (1). The Court must make a de novo determination of any portions of a magistrate's report or finds to which a party raises an objection, and reviews only for “clear error on the face of the record” when there are no objections to the R & R. Gomez v. Brown,

(S.D.N.Y. 2009). Clear error is found only when, upon review of the entire record, the Court is left with “the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Laster v. Mancini, No. O7-CV—8265 (DAB),

, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2013) (quoting United States v. Snow,

(2d Cir. 2006)). Objections to Judge Cave’s R & R were due by June 30, 2021. As of September 29, 2021, no objections have been filed. The Court thus reviews the R & R for clear error, and finds none. The Court therefore adopts the R & R in its entirety and GRANTS Plaintiff's motions for

judgment on the pleadings, on the grounds described by Judge Cave, DENIES the Commissioner’s motion, and REMANDS this case for further administrative proceedings.

SO ORDERED. Dated: September 29, 2021 \) f New York, New York ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge