District Court, S.D. New York, 2021

Cochran v. The Owner(s) of the name brand Toothpaste Close-Up

Cochran v. The Owner(s) of the name brand Toothpaste Close-Up
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided September 30, 2021
Cochran v. The Owner(s) of the name brand Toothpaste Close-Up

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSEPH MELVIN COCHRAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 21-CV-8072 (LTS) -against- ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE THE OWNER(S) OF THE NAME BRAND OR IFP APPLICATION TOOTHPASTE “CLOSE-UP”/ AND THEIR COMPANIES, ETC., Defendants.

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who is currently incarcerated in the Anna M. Kross Center on Rikers Island, brings this action pro se. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $402.00 in fees that are required to file a civil action in this Court or submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees.

To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a prisoner must either pay $402.00 in fees – a $350.00 filing fee plus a $52.00 administrative fee – or, to request authorization to proceed without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application and a prisoner authorization. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. If the Court grants a prisoner’s IFP application, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the Court to collect the $350.00 filing fee in installments deducted from the prisoner’s account.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). A prisoner seeking to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees must therefore authorize the Court to withdraw these payments from his account by filing a “prisoner authorization,” which directs the facility where the prisoner is incarcerated to deduct the $350.00 filing fee from the prisoner’s account in installments and to The $52.00 administrative fee for filing a civil action does not apply to persons granted IFP status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. send to the Court certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the past six months.

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), (b).

Plaintiff submitted the complaint with a prisoner authorization but without a completed IFP application. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $402.00 in fees or submit the attached IFP application. If Plaintiff submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 21-CV-8072 (LTS).2 The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 30, 2021 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

2 Plaintiff is cautioned that if a prisoner files a federal civil action or appeal that is dismissed as frivolous or malicious, or for failing to state a claim, the dismissal is a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). A prisoner who receives three “strikes” cannot file federal civil actions IFP as a prisoner, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, and must pay the filing fees at the time of filing any new federal civil action.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.