Martinez v. Paramount Country Club, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Martinez v. Paramount Country Club, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT RRS Se SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PO ET ORL □□□□ MARCO MARTINEZ, Poe a [0D □□□ Plaintiff, : Se Yi 2/ ORDER PARAMOUNT COUNTRY CLUB, LLC, 18 CV 4668 (VB) Defendant. : ee ee eer ene eee ee serena eee en eene essere Xx On September 17, 2019, the Court granted in part and denied in part defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and dismiss or stay this action pending arbitration. (Doc. #84). The Court further ordered the parties to inform the Court by joint letter of the status of arbitration by December 31, 2019, every ninety days thereafter. The parties have diligently complied with the Court’s September 17 Order. In light of the parties’ diligence, no further status updates are necessary. Rather, the action will remain STAYED pending arbitration and the Court will administratively close the case. The parties may move by letter motion to reopen the case within thirty days of the conclusion of arbitration, if necessary. The Clerk is instructed to administratively close this case, without prejudice to either party moving by letter motion to reopen the case within thirty days of the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings.’ . Dated: October 1, 2021. White Plains, NY SO ORDERED: Iu Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge See Zimmerman v. UBS AG,

2018 WL 4054860

, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2018), appeal dismissed,

789 F. App’x 914

, 915-16 (2d Cir. 2020) (summary order) (“The district court’s administrative closure of the case does not constitute a final decision: there is no jurisdictional significance to [a] docket entry marking [a] case.as ‘closed,’ which we will assume was made for administrative or statistical convenience.”’).

Reference

Status
Unknown