Torres v. Golden Home Furniture Inc
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EDLOECC #T:R ONIC ALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 10/4/2 021 SERGIO TORRES, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, -against- 1:20-cv-04789-MKV GOLDEN HOME FURNITURE INC. d/b/a Golden ORDER Home Furniture; 7 STAR HOME FURNITURE INC. d/b/a 7 Star Furniture; MOHAMMAD ALDAOU; FRANK DOE; and DAVID ALDAOU a/k/a Akman, Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: Plaintiff commenced this action on June 23, 2020, by filing the Complaint [ECF No. 1].
Copies of the summons and Complaint were served on Defendants Golden Home Furniture Inc. and 7 Star Home Furniture Inc. on July 14, 2020, with proof of service filed on October 1, 2020 [ECF Nos. 17–18], and Defendants Mohammad Aldaou, Frank Doe, and David Aldaou on February 23, 2021, with proof of service filed on March 3, 2021 [ECF Nos. 28–30].
The Clerk of Court issued Certificates of Default as to Defendants Golden Home Furniture Inc. and 7 Star Home Furniture Inc. on October 15, 2020 [ECF Nos. 23–24], and Defendants Mohammad Aldaou, Frank Doe, and David Aldaou on March 22, 2021 [ECF Nos. 37–39].
Plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment on June 7, 2021. [ECF No. 41].
On August 10, 2021, the Court held a telephonic hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. Counsel Michael Antonio Faillace appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Defendants did not appear. [ECF No. 46].
On August 10, 2021, the Court denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment without prejudice. [ECF No. 46]. The Court held that Plaintiff had “failed to allege adequately that the individual Defendants were his employers under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law.” [ECF No. 46].
Plaintiff thereafter has failed to take any action or further prosecute this case. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file on or before November 4, 2021 either a renewed motion that addresses the deficiencies the Court identified in its Order denying without prejudice, Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment filed on June 7, 2021 or a letter explaining why Plaintiff has failed to do so. Failure to comply with this order by November 4, 2021 may result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001).
SO ORDERED.
Date: October 4, 2021 MARY@AY V New York, NY United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.