District Court, S.D. New York, 2021

Adams v. 339-347 East 12th Street Investor, LLC

Adams v. 339-347 East 12th Street Investor, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided October 25, 2021 · No. 1:21-cv-06441
Adams v. 339-347 East 12th Street Investor, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

USDC SDNY

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT JOSHUA ADAMS, ELECTRONICALLY FILED

DOC #: Plaintiff, DATE FILED: _ 10/25/2021

-against-

339-347 EAST 12TH STREET INVESTOR, LLC, 21 Civ. 6441 (AT) and SALTWATERNYC LLC, ORDER

Defendants.

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:

Plaintiff Joshua Adams brings this action for mjunctive relief against Defendants 339-347 East 12th Street Investor, LLC, and SALTWATERNYC, LLC, for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181, ef. seq. Compl., ECF No. 1. On October 20, 2021, Plaintiff requested a certificate of default stating that it had served Defendants “by personally serving Nancy Dougherty in the office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2021,” and that “Defendant[s’] time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint expired on September 1, 2021.” ECF No. 16. On October 20, 2021, the Clerk of Court issued a certificate of default. ECF No. 18. However, on October 21, 2021, counsel for Defendant 339-347 East 12th Street Investor, LLC, filed a notice of appearance. ECF No. 21.

It is “well established that default judgments are disfavored,” and that there is a strong preference for resolving disputes on the merits. Pecarsky v. Galaxiworld.com, Ltd., 249 F.3d 167, 174 (2d Cu. 2001). In deciding whether a default judgment should be issued, courts consider whether the default was willful, whether the plaintiffs would be prejudiced by the denial of the motion for default judgment, and whether the allegedly defaulting parties may have any meritorious defenses to the plaintiffs’ claims. See id. at 170-71. “[B]ecause defaults are generally disfavored and are reserved for rare occasions, when doubt exists as to whether a default should be granted or vacated, the doubt should be resolved in favor of the defaulting party.” Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993).

In light of the above standard, the parties shall confer about whether they intend to file a joint stipulation vacating the Certificate of Default and any other outstanding issues thus far. By November 8, 2021, the parties shall file such proposed joint stipulation or a joint letter indicating each party’s position.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 25, 2021

New York, New York }-

ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.