Nisbett v. Hardscoop Inc

District Court, S.D. New York

Nisbett v. Hardscoop Inc

Trial Court Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT son. 1107001 : 11/9/2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED KAREEM NISBETT, Plaintiff, 1:21-cv-6501-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL HARDSCOOP, INC., Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 11]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by December 10, 2021. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,

356 F.3d 492

, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). ECF Nos. 8 and 10 are denied without prejudice as moot. SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: November 9, 2021 MARY Hav V if New York, NY United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown