Stewart v. Kamtech Solutions Corp.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
YOHANCE STEWART and THERESA
HUTCHINSON,
Plaintiffs, v. 21-CV-1800 (RA) KAMTECH SOLUTIONS CORP., SALAL ORDER
CREDIT UNION, FINANCIAL
ASSISTANCE, INC.,
Defendants.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:
On October 15, 2021, Defendants filed a letter motion seeking to stay discovery pending a decision on their motions to dismiss. Dkt. 54. Plaintiffs opposed the motion to stay discovery and, on December 8, 2021, filed a motion to compel discovery. Dkts. 56, 57. Having considered the relevant factors in deciding whether to stay discovery pending a dispositive motion—the strength of the dispositive motion, the breadth of discovery sought and the burden of responding to it, and prejudice to the party opposing the stay, see Spencer Trask Software & Info. Servs., LLC vy. RPost Ltd., 206 F.R.D. 367, 368 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)—the Court finds that a stay is appropriate here. Accordingly, discovery in this action is hereby stayed pending further order of the Court. SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 9, 2021 Ui] /
New York, New York —Y
RONNIE ABRAMS
United States District Judge
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.