Clarke v. United States

District Court, W.D. New York

Clarke v. United States

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

DEMOR CLARKE,

Plaintiff,

v. 19-CV-328-LJV-LGF DECISION & ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

On March 13, 2019, the plaintiff, Demor Clarke, commenced this action while he was detained at the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility awaiting removal from the United States. Docket Item 1. On October 10, 2019, this Court referred the matter to United States Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio for all proceedings under

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(A) and (B). Docket Item 7. On November 21, 2019, Clarke was removed from the United States. Docket Item 12 at 9-10, 12, 15. He did not leave a forwarding address.

Id. at 5, 12

. On December 3, 2019, Judge Foschio adjourned the matter until February 4, 2020, to allow Clarke time to contact the court and update his address. Docket Item 9. To date, Clarke has not contacted the court, the Clerk of the Court, or the defendant. On February 24, 2020, the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for Clarke’s failure to prosecute. Docket Item 12. Clarke did not respond to that motion. On January 5, 2021, Judge Foschio issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) finding that the defendant's motion should be granted. Docket Item 16. The parties did not object to the R&R, and the time to do so now has expired. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). A district court may accept, reject, or modify the findings or recommendations of a magistrate judge.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The court must review de novo those portions of a magistrate judge’s recommendation to which a party

objects.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). But neither

28 U.S.C. § 636

nor Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 requires a district court to review the recommendation of a magistrate judge to which no objections are raised. See Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149-50

(1985). Although not required to do so in light of the above, this Court nevertheless has reviewed Judge Foschio's R&R as well as the submissions to him. Clarke has left no forwarding address, nor has he made any attempt to update his address or otherwise participate in this case. The Court accordingly is left with the impression that Clarke has abandoned his claims. Therefore, this Court accepts and adopts Judge Foschio's

recommendation to grant the motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated above and in the R&R, the defendant's motion to dismiss, Docket Item 12, is GRANTED; the complaint, Docket Item 1, is dismissed; and the Clerk of the Court shall close the file. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 8, 2021 Buffalo, New York

U lnvele LAWRENCE J. VILARDO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown