Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company v. Claire Construction Corp.
Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company v. Claire Construction Corp.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------x ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff, Case No. 1:21-cv-03270-FB-MMH
-against-
CLAIRE CONSTRUCTION CORP., et al.,
Defendants. ------------------------------------------------x BLOCK, Senior District Judge: On November 30, 2021, Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that default judgments against Defendants Claire Construction Corp., Homeport LLC, HP Services Inc., Shallan Haddad, and Walter Orue be held in abeyance pending decisions on Defendants Claire Construction Corp. and Homeport LLC’s motions to vacate the Clerk’s entry of default. Magistrate Judge Henry’s R&R stated that failure to object within fourteen days of the date of the R&R waives the right to appeal. No objections were filed. If clear notice has been given of the consequences of failing to object and there are no objections, the Court may adopt the R&R without de novo review. See Smith v. Campbell,
782 F.3d 93, 102(2d Cir. 2015) (“Where parties receive clear notice of the consequences, failure to timely object to a magistrate's report and recommendation operates as a waiver of further judicial review of the magistrate's
decision.”) (internal citations omitted). The Court will excuse the failure to object and conduct de novo review if it appears that the magistrate judge may have committed plain error. See Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility,
219 F.3d 162, 174(2d Cir. 2000). No such error appears here. Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R without de novo review and directs the Clerk to enter judgment in accordance with the R&R. SO ORDERED.
__/S/ Frederic Block__________ FREDERIC BLOCK Senior United States District Judge
Brooklyn, New York February 4, 2022
Reference
- Status
- Unknown