Golom v. The United States of America c/o The Office of General Counsel

District Court, E.D. New York

Golom v. The United States of America c/o The Office of General Counsel

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x JOHN D. GOLOM,

Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER - against - 20-CV-388

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O THE OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL et al.,

Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------x PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff John D. Golom, proceeding pro se, commenced the instant action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). By Memorandum and Order dated June 21, 2021, the Honorable LaShann DeArcy Hall, U.S.D.J., granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the complaint in its entirety pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) and

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B)(ii). However, Plaintiff was granted thirty (30) days from the date of the Memorandum and Order to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was informed that if he failed to file an amended complaint within 30 days, his action would be dismissed for failure to prosecute. More than 30 days has elapsed, and Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this action. The Court certifies pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438

, 444–45 (1962). SO ORDERED.

/s/ Pamela K. Chen Pamela K. Chen United States District Judge Dated: April 11, 2022 Brooklyn, New York

Reference

Status
Unknown