Torres v. Gotham Drywall Inc.
Torres v. Gotham Drywall Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
OSCAR TORRES, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, 21-CV-5536 (ARR) (RLM) Plaintiff Opinion & Order — against — Not for electronic or print GOTHAM DRYWALL INC. and JOHN FITZPATRICK, publication Defendants.
ROSS, United States District Judge: This Court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated June 14, 2022, from the Honorable Roanne L. Mann, United States Magistrate Judge. The parties consented, on the record, to waive any objections. The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-874 (CBA)(LB),
2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011), aff’d,
472 F. App’x 73(2d Cir. 2012) (summary order). Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH)(LB),
2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd.,
812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189(E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, I approve the settlement agreement, as modified on the record and clarified by parties’ June 13, 2022, joint letter. See Docket Entry, ECF No. 16. SO ORDERED. _______/s/________________ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge
Dated: June 15, 2022 Brooklyn, New York
Reference
- Status
- Unknown