Mclaurin v. Syracuse Police Department

District Court, N.D. New York

Mclaurin v. Syracuse Police Department

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CURTIS MCLAURIN,

Plaintiff, 5:22-cv-372 (BKS/DJS)

v.

CITY OF SYRACUSE POLICE DEPARTMENT and ONONDAGA COUNTY,

Defendants.

Appearance: Plaintiff pro se: Curtis Mclaurin 96002141 Onondaga County Justice Center 555 South State Street Syracuse, New York 13202 Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, Chief United States District Judge: MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff pro se Curtis Mclaurin brought this action on April 19, 2022, alleging, inter alia, that Defendants City of Syracuse Police Department and Onondaga County violated his federal rights. (Dkt. No. 1). This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart who, on July 29, 2022, issued a Report-Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed with leave to amend because “[i]t consists of a series of differently captioned documents that fail to specifically articulate Plaintiff’s allegations.” (Dkt. No. 8, at 5, 7). Magistrate Judge Stewart noted that it “appear[ed] the allegations underlying the Complaint may relate to the filing of charges against Plaintiff in April 2022 that he alleges are false,” but that Plaintiff failed to “identify the factual basis for his claims or explain on what basis he has sued” Defendants. (/d. at 5). Magistrate Judge Stewart advised Plaintiff that, under

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1), he had fourteen days within which to file written objections to the Report- Recommendation, and that failure to object within fourteen days would preclude appellate review. (/d. at 7-8). Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Report-Recommendation. As no objection to the Report-Recommendation has been filed, and the time for filing objections has expired, the Court reviews the Report-Recommendation for clear error. See Petersen v. Astrue,

2 F. Supp. 3d 223, 228-29

(N.D.N.Y. 2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error and found none, the Court adopts the Report-Recommendation in its entirety. For these reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Stewart’s Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 8) is ADOPTED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, with leave to file an amended complaint; and it is further ORDERED that any amended complaint must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Any amended complaint must be a complete pleading which will replace the current complaint in total; and it 1s further ORDERED that if Plaintiff files a timely amended complaint, it shall be referred to Magistrate Judge Stewart for review; and if Plaintiff fails to file a ttmely amended complaint, the Clerk is directed to close this case; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. Dated: September 6, 2022 bran Ba (Sn aries Syracuse, New York Chit US. District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown