Shotts v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Shotts v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Trial Court Opinion

USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Cin CALEY □□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 01/12/2022

KATHLEEN SHOTTS,

Plauntilf 21-CV-7047 (RA) METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE ORDER COMPANY, Defendant.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that a settlement has been reached with all parties. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without fees or costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,

791 F.3d 354, 358

(2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 12, 2022 {7 New York, New York KA. — RONNIE ABRAMS United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown