District Court, S.D. New York, 2022

Abadi v. British Airways PLC

Abadi v. British Airways PLC
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided January 25, 2022
Abadi v. British Airways PLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AARON ABADI, Plaintiff, ~ against - 21 Civ. 10825 (PGG) ROBERTS, WENDY GOMEZ, and NUMEROUS | - ORDER OF SERVICE UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC, Defendants.

PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiff Aaron Abadi, appearing pro se, brings this action, alleging that Defendants discriminated against him based on his disability. By order dated January 14, 2022, the Court granted Abadi’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis (“IFP”).

DISCUSSION I SERVICE ON BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC, MATTHEW ROBERTS, AND WENDY GOMEZ Because Abadi has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process... in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (providing that a court must order the Marshals Service or a specially appointed person to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP). Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that summonses and the complaint be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Abadi is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued. If the complaint is not served within that time, Abadi should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service); see also Murray v. Pataki, 378 F. App’x 50, 52 (2d Cir. 2010) (“As long as the [plaintiff proceeding IFP] provides the information necessary to identify the defendant, the Marshals’ failure to effect service automatically constitutes ‘good cause’ for an extension of time within the meaning of Rule 4(m).”).

To allow Abadi to effect service on Defendants British Airways PLC, Matthew Roberts, and Wendy Gomez through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for each of these defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon these defendants.

Abadi must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

IL JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS Although the Complaint references a number of British Airways employees (see Cmplt. (Dkt. No. 2) at 2 (“There were several other employees of British Airways that participated in the discrimination and harassment of this Plaintiff. . .”), the Complaint does not make clear which particular British Airways employees Abadi intends to name as Defendants — e.g., by identifying their role or the dates on which Abadi claims they discriminated against him, even if Abadi does not currently know their names. Accordingly, the Court declines at this time to issue an order pursuant to Valentin v. Dinkins, 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997) (holding that a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant), seeking the identities of the unnamed British Airways employee Defendants.

CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, the Clerk of Court is instructed to issue summonses, complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for British Airways PLC, Matthew Roberts, and Wendy Gomez, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Abadi, together with an information package.

Dated: New York, New York January 25, 2022 SO ORDERED. lat2 Aprd A Paul G. Gardephe United States District Judge DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES 1. British Airways PLC West 42nd Street 24" Floor New York, New York 10036 2. Matthew Roberts British Airways PLC Washington Dulles Airport P.O. Box 17286 Washington, DC 20041 3, Wendy Gomez British Airways PLC JFK International Airport (Cargo Bldg. 66) Jamaica, New York 11430

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.