Norris v. Mulberry And Grand, Inc.
Norris v. Mulberry And Grand, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 1/31/2 022 -------------------------------------------------------------- X NAMEL NORRIS, : Plaintiff, : : -against- : 21-CV-7440 (VEC) : MULBERRY AND GRAND, INC., a New York : ORDER corporation, d/b/a MULBERRY & GRAND, a/k/a : MURE & GRAND, and BLEECKER STREET : TENANTS CORP., a New York corporation, : : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------- X VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: WHEREAS on January 28, 2022 (Dkt. 29), the parties notified the Court that they have reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines are CANCELLED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs (including attorneys’ fees) to either party. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all open motions and to CLOSE the case. Within 30 days of this order, the parties may apply to reopen this case. Any such application must show good cause for holding the case open in light of the parties’ settlement and must be filed within 30 days. Any request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause may be denied solely on that basis. Additionally, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce their settlement agreement, they must submit within the same 30-day period: (1) their settlement agreement to the Court in accordance with Rule 7.A of the Court’s Individual Practices and (2) a request that the Court issue an order expressly retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. See Hendrickson v. United States,
791 F.3d 354(2d Cir. 2015). SO ORDERED. « ,
Date: January 31, 2022 VALERIE CAPRA =I New York, NY United States District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown