DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: 1/31/22 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Johanna Fernandez Pena, Plaintiff, 20-cv-7897 (AJN) (SLC) —y— ORDER Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Before the Court is Judge Cave’s Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant the Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c). See Dkt. No. 24. When considering the findings and recommendations of a Magistrate Judge, the Court may “accept, reject, or modify [them], in whole or in part.”

(b)(1). The Court must make a de novo determination of any portions of a magistrate’s report or findings to which a party raises an objection, and reviews only for “clear error on the face of the record” when there are no objections to the Report and Recommendation. Brennan v. Colvin, No. 13-cv-6338 (AJN),

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2015); see also Hicks v. Ercole, No. 09-cv- 2531 (AJN) (MHD),

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2015); Gomez v. Brown,

(S.D.N.Y. 2009). Clear error is found only when, upon review of the entire record, the Court is left with “the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Laster v. Mancini, No. 07-CV-8265 (DAB) (MHD),

, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2013) (quoting United States v. Snow,

(2d Cir. 2006)).

Objections to Judge Cave’s Report and Recommendation were due by January 12, 2022. See Dkt. No. 29 at 37. As of January 31, 2022, no objections have been filed. The Court thus reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error, and finds none. The Court therefore adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and GRANTS Defendant’s motion to judgment on the pleadings for the reasons provided in Judge Cave’s Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of Court is respectfully ordered to close this case.

SO ORDERED. Dated: January 31, 2022 AN \) ig New York, New York ALISONJ.NATHAN) United States District Judge