District Court, S.D. New York, 2022

Rodriguez Ramos v. Jay Global Enterprises, Inc.

Rodriguez Ramos v. Jay Global Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided February 9, 2022
Rodriguez Ramos v. Jay Global Enterprises, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX YELSOM EMANUEL RODRIGUEZ RAMOS, : Plaintiff, : : 21 Civ. 8617 (JPC) -v- : : ORDER JAY GLOBAL ENTERPRISES, INC. and GURUM : CORPORATION, : Defendants. : wee KX JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: On January 26, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff “to file a status letter by February 2, 2021, describing (1) whether service of the amended summons and Amended Complaint has been made on Defendants, and (2) if service has not been effected on Defendants, whether Plaintiff requests an extension of time to serve Defendants.” Dkt. 7 at 1. The deadline has passed and Plaintiff has not filed this ordered status letter. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 authorizes a court to dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or comply with a court order. Fed R. Civ. P. 41(b); see LeSane v. Hall’s Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) (“[I]t 1s unquestioned that Rule 41(b) also gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff's case sua sponte for failure to prosecute ....”). By February 14, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a status letter as outlined in the Court’s prior Order. If Plaintiff fails to file the status letter and/or the proof of service on the docket by February 14, 2022, the Court may dismiss this case without further notice for failure to comply with the Court’s orders and Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 9, 2022 ) hop 2 New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.