Morales v. 740 Roast Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Morales v. 740 Roast Corp.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED others similarly situated, : te

Plaintiffs, 1:20-cv-03740 (SDA) -against- ORDER 740 Roast Corp. et al., Defendants.

STEWART D. AARON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case contains one or more claims arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties apprised the Court on January 18, 2022 that a settlement has been reached. (ECF No. 51.) The parties thereafter consented to have all proceedings held before me. (ECF No. 53.) In light of the requirements of Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.,

796 F.3d 199

(2d Cir. 2015), the parties must file a joint letter or motion that addresses whether the settlement is fair and reasonable. Any such letter or motion shall be filed no later than February 25, 2022, and should address the claims and defenses, the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the bases for any such calculations, the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiffs’ case and the defendants’ defenses, any other factors that justify the discrepancy between the potential value of plaintiffs’ claims and the settlement amount, the litigation and negotiation process, as well as any other issues that might be pertinent to the question of whether the settlement is reasonable (for example, the collectability of any judgment if the case went to trial). The joint letter or motion should also explain the attorney fee arrangement, attach a copy

of the retainer agreement, and provide information as to actual attorney’s fees expended and the relevant experience of the attorney(s). Finally, a copy of the settlement agreement itself must accompany the joint letter or motion. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York February 10, 2022

STEWART D. AARON United States Magistrate Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown