District Court, S.D. New York, 2022

Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd v. Pareteum Corporation

Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd v. Pareteum Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided February 10, 2022
Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund Ltd v. Pareteum Corporation

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT / Fs e/ bA rulv ai rn y K 10. ,H 2e 0l 2le 2rstein SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X SABBY VOLATILITY WARRANT MASTER : FUND, LTD., : Case No. l:19-cv-10460-NRB : Plaintiff, : : v. : : PARETEUM CORPORATION, ROBERT H. : TURNER, EDWARD O'DONNELL, DENIS : MCCARTHY, VICTOR BOZZO, ROBERT : LIPPERT, YVES VAN SANTE, and LUIS : JIMENEZ-TUNON, : : Defendants. : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Defendant Pareteum Corporation moves this Court for an order staying further proceedings, including remaining Scheduling Order deadlines and hearings related to the same.

Plaintiff does not oppose this relief. Pareteum is filing an unopposed request for the same stay in In re Pareteum Securities Litigation, No. 1:19-cv-09767-AKH-GWG (S.D.N.Y.).

This Court’s “power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants,” with the “basic goal” being “to avoid prejudice” to the parties. Delgado v. NJ Transit Rail Operations, Inc., 329 F.R.D. 506, 507-08 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (granting motion to stay all proceedings). A stay is merited here because of (1) ongoing government investigation related to the subject matter of this litigation, and (2) the precarious financial status of Pareteum, which has been exploring a range of strategic alternatives to address ongoing liquidity constraints.

See Parker v. Dawson, No. 06-CV-6191 JFB WDW, 2007 WL 2462677, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2007) (granting stay of all proceedings due to ongoing government investigation).

Pareteum has been engaged in mediation to try to resolve this litigation but has been hampered by the two factors referenced above. The parties believe that a stay of this action will help to preserve scarce resources, including liability insurance assets, while the parties await further clarity on ongoing government investigation and the financial condition of Pareteum.

As noted above, Plaintiff does not oppose this relief. Additionally, Individual Defendants Robert H. Turner, Edward O’Donnell, Victor Bozzo, Denis McCarthy, Robert Lippert, Yves Van Sante, and Luis Jimenez-Tunon do not oppose this Motion. The parties will report to the Court on the status of this matter within ninety (90) days of entry of an Order staying the proceedings.

Dated: February 4, 2022 MCGUIREWOODS LLP /s/ Stephen G. Foresta Stephen G. Foresta Jeffrey J. Chapman McGuireWoods LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas 20th Floor New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 548-7060 Facsimile: (212) 715-6277 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Pareteum Corporation TO: Counsel of Record (Via ECF)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.