LsaDt son ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ee eee SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK —————

Mattel, Inc., Plaintiff, 21-cv-1507 (AJN) (SLC) _y_ ORDER Agogo Store et al., Defendants.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: On November 5, 2021, the Court referred Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Defendants to Magistrate Judge Sara L. Cave. Dkt. No. 36. On January 31, 2022, Judge Cave filed a Report & Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against Defendants. Dkt. No. 39. When considering the findings and recommendations of a Magistrate Judge, the Court may “accept, reject, or modify [them], in whole or in part.”

(b)(1). The Court must make a de novo determination of any portions of a magistrate’s report or findings to which a party raises an objection, and reviews only for “clear error on the face of the record” when there are no timely objections to the Report & Recommendation. Banks v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 19-cv-929 (AJN) (SDA),

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 27, 2020); see also Brennan y. Colvin, No. 13-cv-6338 (AJN),

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2015); Hicks v. Ercole, No. 09-cv-2531 (AJN) (MHD),

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2015); Gomez v. Brown,

(S.D.N.Y. 2009). Clear error is found only when, upon review of the entire record, the Court is left with “the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Laster v. Mancini, No. 07-cv-8265 (DAB)

(MHD),

, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2013) (quoting United States v. Snow,

(2d Cir. 2006)). As of this date, no objections to the Report & Recommendation have been filed, and the deadline for objections has passed. See Dkt. No. 39 at 26. Thus, the Court reviews the Report & Recommendation for clear error, and it finds none. The Court therefore adopts the Report & Recommendation in its entirety and GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment against Defendants. The Court also orders (1) judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants in the amount of $1,450,000.000, plus post-judgment interest; (2) a permanent injunction be entered; (3) an asset restraining notice be served pursuant to C.P.L.R. § 5222; (4) the automatic stay imposed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62 be dissolved and the judgment be enforced immediately; and (5) Plaintiffs $5,000 bond be returned upon the final disposition of the case. This resolves docket number 36. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in accordance with the Report & Recommendation and close this case.

SO ORDERED. h li, i di Dated: February 22, 2022 \) New York, New York ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge