Murphy v. Triple-S Management Corporation
Murphy v. Triple-S Management Corporation
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: JOHN MURPHY, DATE FILED: 3/22 /2022 Plaintiff, -against- TRIPLE-S MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, ROBERTO GARCIA- 1:21-cv-10259 ODRIGUEZ, LUIS A. CLAVELL- RODRIGUEZ, CARI M. DOMINGUEZ, ORDER OF DISMISSAL STEPHEN L. ONDRA, GAIL B. MARCUS, ROBERTA HERMAN, DAVID H. CHAFEY, JR., MANUEL FIGUEROA-COLLAZO, and ROBERTO SANTA MARIA, Defendants. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: On March 7, 2022, the Court entered an Order directing Plaintiff to serve the summons and Complaint on Defendants on or before March 21, 2022, or to show cause why service has not been made. [ECF No. 3]. The Court warned that failure to comply with the Court’s Order would result in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute. To date, Plaintiff has not filed proof of service, shown cause why service has not been made, or taken any other action to prosecute the case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued for failure to prosecute without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by April 22, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See LeSane v. Hall’s Sec. Analyst, Inc.,
239 F.3d 206, 209(2d Cir. 2001) (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626, 630(1962)). SO ORDERED. | i / ln Date: March 22, 2022 MARY gh vykocid New York, NY United Sfates District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown