Paguada v. Habermaass Corporation, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Paguada v. Habermaass Corporation, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 4/19/2022 JOSUE PAGUADA, Plaintiff, 1:22-cv-01091-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL HABERMAAS CORPORATION, INC., Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendant informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 8]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by May 20, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,

356 F.3d 492

, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i . . Date: April 19, 20212 MARY/KAY ha tt New York, NY United‘States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown