Costantino v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Costantino v. City of New York

Trial Court Opinion

VUIVe DVINI DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED:__ 5/11/2022 SARA COSTANTINO, Plaintiff, -against- CITY OF NEW YORK; COMMANDING OFFICER 1:21-cv-07248-MKV JOHN DOE, first and last name unknown, Shield No. Unknown; POLICE OFFICER JANE ROE, first and ORDER OF DISMISSAL last name unknown, Shield No. Unknown; and POLICE OFFICER CARASQUILLO, first name unknown, Shield No. Unknown, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 13]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by June 11, 2022. Ifno such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,

356 F.3d 492

, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: May 11, 2022 MARY cy visdoci New York, NY United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown