Rushing v. Highlands County

District Court, S.D. New York

Rushing v. Highlands County

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHAUN RUSHING, Plaintiff, 22-CV-3863 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL HIGHLANDS COUNTY; STATE OF UNDER

28 U.S.C. § 1651

FLORIDA; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On January 3, 2022, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new civil action in this court in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Rushing v. Extra Space Storage, ECF 1:21-CV-9113, 5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2022). Plaintiff files this new pro se action, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the Court. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s January 3, 2022 order. The Court also denies Plaintiff’s application for the Court to request pro bono counsel (ECF 3) as moot. The Court certifies, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: May 12, 2022 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown