UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | tncaony SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee So wee ew ew ee ee eee Eee ee eee ee KX Docs, RONICALLY FILED KIT-YIN SNYDER, et ano., DATE nin S4¥3>| Plaintiffs

-against- 22-cv-3873 (LAK)

ERIC ADAMS, etc., et al., Defendants. we ee ee ee ee ee ee ee HX

ORDER LEwIs A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Insofar as this action is brought against defendants New York City Department of Design and Construction, New York City Department of Cultural Affairs, New York City Public Design Commission, formally known as the Art Commission of the City of New York, and New York City Department of Correction, it is dismissed, as none of these is a suable entity distinct from the City of New York. See, e.g., Jenkins v. City of New York,

, 93 n.19 (2d Cir. 2007); Longe v. City of New York, 802 Fed. App’x 635, 638-39 (2d Cir. 2020); N.Y C. Charter § 396. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 18, 2022 / Une, — Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge