UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Hopes UMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK os CH aonte □ nnn nn nnn nnn nnn nn nnn nnn nnn □□□ □□□ eX ona ue MANANA TARALASHVILI, EE pate cepa Plaintiff, . coon Sato ORDER : —

TYREE LATWAN MELVIN and PLUMMER 22 CV 4208 (VB) ENTERPRISES LLC, : Defendant. : ene ee eee eee en ee ce eee ne eee eX

Plaintiff brings this action invoking subject matter jurisdiction by reason of diversity of citizenship under

. To invoke diversity jurisdiction under

, there must be complete diversity of citizenship. Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis,

(1996). Thus,

“applies only to cases in which the citizenship of each plaintiff is diverse from the citizenship of each defendant.” Id.; see also Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche,

(2005). Specifically,

(a)(1) applies when the dispute is between “citizens of different States.” A limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its individual or entity members. Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. Ltd. P’ship,

, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000). Here, the complaint alleges defendant Plummer Enterprises LLC “is a domestic limited liability company duly authorized and existing under and by virtue of the law of the State of Arizona.” (Doc. #1 at 1). However, the complaint does not allege the citizenship of each individual or entity member of defendant. Accordingly, by May 31, 2022, plaintiff’s counsel shall submit a letter explaining in detail the citizenship of defendant Plummer Enterprises LLC, so the Court can determine whether it has subject matter jurisdiction. Dated: May 24, 2022 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:

Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge