Ingram IV v. Cuomo
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WILBERT INGRAM IV, Plaintiff, — against — RD 22 Misc. 147 (ER) QUEENS COUNTY THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.
RAMos, D.J.: Whereas Plaintiff filed this pro se action as a purported miscellaneous case (Doc. 1); Whereas Plaintiff’s complaint asserts claims for damages and injunctive relief (id. □□ Whereas Plaintiff’s complaint does not fit any of the listed categories of miscellaneous matter; The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to: 1. Open this case as a new civil action and assign the case to the Undersigned’s docket.
2. Administratively close this miscellaneous case.
3. Mail a copy of this order to the Plaintiff.
SO ORDERED.
2Q\) Dated: June 16, 2022 FE New York, New York Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.