Hancock v. Schwartz Vays

District Court, S.D. New York

Hancock v. Schwartz Vays

Trial Court Opinion

USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 06/16/2022 ROXANNE HANCOCK, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, y 22-CV-2016 (RA) SCHWARTZ VAYS, SCHWARTZ VAYS ORDER NY, LLC, AXELA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and JOHN DOES 1-25, Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that the parties have reached an agreement to settle this case. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States,

791 F.3d 354, 358

(2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 16, 2022 Uf New York, New York OY — Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown