Maoz v. Aple Shop
Maoz v. Aple Shop
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ODED MAOZ, Plaintiff, 22-CV-2039 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL APLE SHOP, Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated April 5, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. On April 19, 2022, the Clerk of Court received notice that the April 5, 2022, order was not deliverable to the address provided by Plaintiff because the address was insufficient. As of the filing of this action, Plaintiff has not contacted the court to update his address. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: June 27, 2022 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown