Ashton v. Al Qaeda Islamic
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK rrr ee te te re te re ee ee ee eee eH HX IN RE: : MEMORANDUM DECISION : AND ORDER TERRORIST ATTACKS ON : SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 03 MDL 1570 (GBD) (SN) weet tt rr tee te re ee eer ee ee ee eee HX This document relates to: Ashton, et al., v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al., No. 02-cv-6977 (GBD) (SN) GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: On July 8, 2022, numerous Plaintiffs in the Ashton case referenced above moved for default judgments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, as well as economic and solatium damages resulting from the death of their loved ones killed in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. (Pls.’ Mot. for Default Js. as to Ashton 24 Wrongful Death Plaintiffs, ECF No. 8191.)! One Plaintiff, Shenan Bradhsaw, moves for solatium damages on grounds that her close relationship with a victim killed in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks merits a finding that she is functionally a family member of the victim (“functional equivalent”).
Ud.) Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn’s July 26, 2022 Report and Recommendation (the “Report”), recommending that the Court grant Plaintiffs’ motion in part and recommending the amounts in which each Plaintiff should be awarded solatium damages. (Report, ECF No. 8269, at 1.) Magistrate Judge Netburn advised the parties that ' All citations included herein refer to documents filed in the 9/11 multidistrict litigation docket. See Jn re Terrorist Attacks on September I1, 2001, 03 MDL 1570 (GBD) (SN). failure to file timely objections to the Report would constitute a waiver of those objections on appeal.” (/d. at 42.)
I. LEGAL STANDARDS A court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations” set forth in a magistrate judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court must review de novo the portions of a magistrate judge’s report to which a party properly objects. /d Portions of a magistrate judge’s report to which no or “merely perfunctory” objections are made are reviewed for clear error. Edwards v. Fischer, 414 F. Supp. 2d 342, 346-47 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (citation omitted). Clear error is present only when “upon review of the entire record, [the court is] left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. Snow, 462 F.3d 55, 72 (2d Cir. 2006) (citation omitted).
No party has filed any objections. Accordingly, after a clear error review the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Netburn’s Report in full.
Il. MAGISTRATE JUDGE NETBURN DID NOT ERR IN HER RECOMMENDATIONS ON DAMAGES Magistrate Judge Netburn did not commit clear error in finding that Plaintiffs properly served Iran and that Iran is liable to these Plaintiffs. Service was rightfully achieved by diplomatic means, and it has become well-established that Iran has yet to appear in this action. (Report at 2.)” “The only outstanding question is [Plaintiffs’] damages.” (/d. at 2.)
2 Any objections are due by August 9, 2022. Given Defendant’s default in all related cases, no objections from Defendant are expected. If any party files timely objections, the Court will reconsider that portion of this order.
There has been a long-established framework for solatium damages awarded to family members of victims who died from the 9/11 attacks. (See Report at 2-3; ECF No. 2623.) “Additionally, the Court has consistently authorized the award of economic damages caused by a decedent’s wrongful death where those damage calculations are appropriately supported by expert testimony.” (Report at 3.) There have been “limited circumstances...damages have been awarded to non-immediate family members who are the ‘functional equivalent’ of immediate family.” (Report at 3.) On October 14, 2016, with refinements on August 8, 2017, this Court established a framework for determining if a Plaintiff is a functional equivalent of immediate family. (See ECF No. 3384; ECF No. 3795.) Magistrate Judge Netburn Report correctly applied these same frameworks to the instant motion seeking damages for similar injuries. (Report at 4-13.)
Specifically, Magistrate Judge Netburn properly recommended awards of solatium damages for Plaintiffs listed in Exhibit A of this opinion. The Report did not err in finding that the Ashton Plaintiffs submitted affidavits regarding their compliance with safeguards ordered by this Court. (See Decl. in Supp. of Mot. for Final Default Js., ECF No. 8192.)
Magistrate Judge Netburn also reviewed the evidentiary support Plaintiffs submitted through experts demonstrating economic damages. (Report at 3.)
As for Plaintiff Shenan Bradhsaw’s request to be treated a functional equivalent, the Report accurately describes the relevant relationship and considers the relevant factors in evaluating whether the relationship was functionally equivalent. (Report at 3-6.)
Specifically, Magistrate Judge Netburn carefully examined the delicate competing factors between Bradhsaw’s relationship with her stepmother and her biological mother. Magistrate > This framework has been used on four separate occasions. (See, e.g., ECF No. 5950; ECF No. 5950.)
Judge Netburn did not commit a clear error in finding that an award of half solatium damages is appropriate for Bradshaw as listed in Exhibit A of this opinion. (See Report at 6.)
Additionally, Magistrate Judge Netburn appropriately found that (1) “Plaintiffs be awarded prejudgment interest on these damages from September 11, 2001, to the date of judgment, at a rate of 4.96 percent per annum, compounded annually;” (2) “Plaintiffs may apply for punitive, economic, and other damages at a later date;” and (3) “any [Ashton] plaintiffs not appearing in this Motion who were not previously awarded damages may still submit applications for damages awards in later stages.” (/d. at 13-14.)
Wt. CONCLUSION Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Judgments, (ECF No. 8191), is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that the Plaintiffs identified in the attached Exhibit A are awarded judgments for pain and suffering damages as set forth in Exhibit A; and it is ORDERED that prejudgment interest is awarded to be calculated at a rate of 4.96 percent per annum, all interest compounded annually over the same period; and it is ORDERED that the Plaintiffs not appearing on Exhibit A and who were not previously awarded damages may submit in later stages applications for punitive, economic, and/or other damages awards that may be approved on the same basis as currently approved for those Plaintiffs appearing on Exhibit A or in prior filings.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions in 03 MDL 1570, ECF No. 7987, and No. 02-cv-6977, ECF No. 1666. paced WUL2 8 2029) New York, New York SO ORDERED. (7 ao | □□ Dorbeds GEORG . DANIELS ed es District Judge EXHIBIT A e]leceijcic eleoleo ~ eyjeyeic |e] ci] es Pl ast |sleisig [sl sig = } =] eal co A] 90 A o op an | tl ole a} ej so es co | B&B] S/O oj) me] «a 2 SPYeya [Spel nr] <] <j) «| □□□ </] < “A Nl cle “A on ~ — ~~ —~ =~ = = | A) Al alas wl na) 2/24) 42) 2) 42) 2) 2 be So ° S S So So S □ ° EE» = = > S Se = = = 5s & oS S o SQ o So So oS o = Co oO oO Oo oO > oO Oo oO SE □□ = O° So 2 O° S So ° @a4 Ace </s/sis is) s| s) 3/2) 213) 3) 312) 3/3 2/2/24 212) A] Al A], BI] BA] A) Al A oloeje eile on effec ea S| ec = 0 Sj} ol —lu S| + st —E oo | Ol tlt SS So Poss af Ore fay &] a = £ Oo |] Slo AQ} we So $s -/alSiS jay] & a4 SB) 5/4 |S) S| 2) <| <| s/s) <|/ <!<|s)¢ lie \o a4 _ Alalals Al wa] A Zz Zz Zz Zz z Zz Zz z z e\lslsojo S| ce}; eo eS1;erele S| S| ec a s|l|slsico Ss! cs! oso > S);e S| Ss #26 Sejssie [Ss] Sl Ss [| fe gigigig jgi gig Seyesie 7S oS) S| <] <j <|] <} <! <] < be atlatlaia a a □□ > = > = > > > > > AlA BS BS! AS!) 2) 2) 212) 2) 2) 2) 2) Zz = + SO 2S £3 <}<j<i< |<} <| <| <| <| <| <| sj <| </< <5 2Z)Z4) 212 Z| 4] 24 Zz 2\|24/ 24), 24 Z. Zz Z| 4 2 3B; 3/13; 3S; SI] 2/2; 2 SiISiSi/S [S| S| S| Bl Sl] S| El El] SE) Sl El = lel = 24)4,/4)4 |4) 4) 4) Oo] 0] GO; OF] OU! UDO, oO . (PAS 4 □ PIizospes ~ we Ess t+ co 20 00 00 °° 20 20 Ss aos Se] el als wl} ow wn © w a a a a a a a □□ = Zl wo | oO] wo] © oO Oo oO ‘Oo Oo □□ ‘o ‘Oo o \o = atet] sls] sist tl tl) FP} el at at = < Loe 1c n 2} 2 - Els i : p= ola >wol>olD>o = SC |S 58 8 □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ 2 = OU Or = Oo S| 3 Bln Sln Sin Sin Be Bow 2 oO i Oo 2 6 > o WN =O MDS SistVEeV®SYCE SV ES o Ses 2 3 9 Cc S\s .5 Ea E< E< gals als a 28 ers ons 3 a 3 gE Sls 2s □□ □□ VS SS geass } ° 3} 2 = □ a O jal s = □ far □ an o |s; & ° co} og}; ££] g = > □ co} S = 2] = 3 > 2 3 3 a — 9S o So} 2 'Sp So) ° 3 rat = ce a QP —_—| = = & © ° □□ □ S bol =| S Zz o 3 a. 3 Oo CO = = 8) 2) eo) €) 8) 2) €] Bg 5 = } |] Bye > > n & □□ ra z □□ a □ 6S =| e] 0 = >| Hl < iS oc | ow > od 5 o|% = > o D oO < S v 3 o oO □ & S/S) do Sg = = Sy 3 aa 3 x = □□ 3)/.2| ss Oo] € e/a] 8 Ss =| 2| 3; 3 — x A/S S]2 □□ a;, 8) el} vi sl <| <i vie < □□ Z| S$ < < Z\Z |Z |2 S i S$ j)slsis Tele 5135/5) 5/5/5 |2 |gigig |g Tate S S oS oO olsic = = S lg S| 2/8 g 2 So Z Zz S < : . : Te Zz. = is S| S |S S Te] els w ny sleis > = S = g : : gE : : S| ele S S = = S oO . QaO}]oO S A S| 515 S |s □ 5 | S 2 S Sis S |S = Ee 5 a S S co S colo > S Oo > ee |e x □□ □ sis So S/S S |e S S : = S S Sle a oS So oS Ar oO N mth S ; o| ala 1S 2 |e : sisi ais 414 2 Nis 2 lg le |e 8 oo aN Ba a S$ < |<j<< Zz |Z) 2/2 Ss \$ zZ|\Z |z £is$/s\s Z2/12)2 S $1 5/3) S/S |$ |S Td. siz |= |S |S Ziz S Z2\Z |Z $ Z < 213/5|35| 5/8 Z| Zz |s Zz iz /|z $ Zz Z <i< i<j< S$ $ <j <\< < Zz Z $ Zz1Z |Z Sji¢|sis z ~ < S$/S/S/S/5 5/315) |S Z\|Z2 |Z s |s z |Z |2 $ > ~~ Zz 18 PS FS □□ E18 |e ‘= i 2 = 5 □ Z 2 = on on 2/2] 8 =| 2) 5/5] &| & 2| 2/2 a = |2 |e Hn nin 6 = = z 516 18 | 6 faim on Leek co PCat hos CM a Fie 1813s 8/8) □□ t SISie is wm [1 Us +, \o w 2 5| 3/2 2 eal< S|) giz Sg eslb= . 2 Se SS 8 218 Ely < 6) 5/5 §/5 gs aos 2 ome] S2S2 Se [2l8 50 ; a 3) 3 bag desbslg 42 24 gle Ee £|lé TA SHA geese SESE a spsbSa Ha Saelg 893 2 SESE eo § 3 a a2 ae lee |s a Ss 8 sss & ae oe =|" 5 8 Sale g Je laeale 2/2 □ 2 z <2) =| 2/8 Sle al 3 feels = 3 sl ole B39 3 se Ejt slits . = 25/2) 35 £5 s|2el23| 3| 2 igi i < |= 6] 2/2 =) 3 os Ss □□□ © = 5|é Sele 3 : =| 3 a7 SESE S| ¥ BIS = 52 £328 = E =| 2/8 BSle □ 5 YQ an 2) 5 E =| 6 z les a |.2 □□ oO 2SIES i 5 ep ls 5 Sis 3 [7 < <| <i < < < xo} ct] <i |) <i et] cl <<} <<) < < Ss | | Oo ~~ ™ Me PP Op OE OE Oe OY ON —~ | ™ Zz Z| ZiZ Zz. Zz 424|2!2| Z| Z|] Z| Z| Z|) Z| Z Zz. > o!|o!|o o So e2rolo;olrorcg; ololjo oO} o!;}o □□ S S S eSrearci cy aici eis Slels □ > Qo} So Oo SoS;}rorol/ co] ol oloocljo oOo}; co]|o oS > o!l1olo oS Oo eorororocgdlroco/ cols oO; olo □□ oS 2 So. = = oS. o oS oS. o oS oS oS. oa oS So, □□ oO o!|o|;}o So oO o;lrorogr cholo} oj soso □□□ o/|o oO wo Co1rorn wy wo Wlolol) ola; co!) co] on Oorn □□ NX oy wy N N N N wo. wy wy oy oO wm wo nN wy wo N □□ t od! oo] + st | t+ | st | 06} 08} 06) 06} od] od] od} oo} ols jt F Fil FA) A FA FA GF | Fl Al FA) 4] 46] Al HAA Al A)A □□ < <i <l/< < < x} <t] <<) xy |] <j <i le </ < < ~— me | | — > mp ee | EP Ome Om OE Om OR ™ pM | □□□ Z Z| Z/2Z Zz Zz 2Z/24| Z| 2) Z| 2) Z| Z| Z(2 Zz < <j) < < oj) ti Cl et] <! <j jx <j) <j < < ™ —~ | oo | ™ . ~~ — me Pp OE OO OO OY ON ~~ | ™ □□ Zz Z| Z\Z Zz Zz 2/1|2Z|2| 2) Z| Z| Z| Z| Zz < Ssif | =| </<S/</<) sis |< </< I< Z Z| 2/24 Zz. Z Z|Z| Z| Z| Z| Z| Z| Zz Z!Z12Z Zz o . ~ Zo * 5 .
Bs2 32 BS 8 od on! sn! on of od | ap ES 420 Ep) 2 ££) S|) €£) sl sl ul sl ul so es si ue |S eseSst 5s □□□ 2! 2) 2) SS) SS se] eS | Bl S/S |S Perse BSRZaozolola ALAS) ALOOLO/OLOlO fA | OUA □□ □□□ OO] a Ww wy WwW | SO} OO] Ol —] Mm] my □□□ Ww] wm) ™ \o Oo} SO] □□ \O \O DO 7 Of] Of] OL MI HIM] HI OO] Ol wy Ww a) 2 2) 2 | 8] 3 : . oO! O° oO] YO) OS & co < EO ae oi so sy) | el el Ss) SIS) Els Est s)5/93]24)22)92) 2) zo) 5) a) 3B □□□ cle SES a wo! -} ol el oe +] oe = = a| s/G a/b Gal x) S| 8] Bla) lal als g) os sess spss 1s 5 s £8) of sl sl sis Fl a Zz) = 0 3 8 S| slo) 8] 3] 8| B17 7) 5] 5 ma) | |) my ea} aa a 4) A — Pp 5 Oo S| > >| >i 2 21s ge |e P =| §/3 = = =} 5! 2] og) 2] 2] of B/S 2! □ < 3| <| 2 ‘Oo 3 So) <=} Sl =} Sls i & 2 = S| 2) ale) Sos 8 8) 87% |S gle ls «| § | el A A} os} & a ws oO .
5 afel¥ | £1 2] sl sie) eisisi2 jails |s 5 g| 2 2) €| $| 3) 3) 518) 8) s els |S sis |B ~ ssf AILS oc = oOo! Ol aA o □□□ 2! 2) Al“) S34) 5/2 | 8] 2/2 8 < 5 Oo □□ < < — Zz ° ° S S S So ma |S S ° oO Ww m 1A A A < < — Zz Zz < < — Zz. Zz Zs < = x= ZO — me oO <= oD 3B zs = | 6 = O 1a ™ WwW Ww C4
□□□ □ Ss UU □□□ O sle = ble 3 oelss oa=atsg gales No|e sk SBI5 0
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.